Skip to main content

Learning Goals

There are three main goals that I am striving to achieve through my learning in the Leadership and Technology course at UOIT:

  1. To gain a better understanding of the innovation-policy gap that exists in technology leadership and what I can do to bridge that gap in my practices.
  2. To gain a deeper understanding of key leadership theories and how they apply to my practice as a department head.
  3. To gain further strategies that I can use as an IT leader in building capacity amongst staff in regards to educational digital technologies.
Achievement of specific goals on a week-by-week basis can be viewed HERE.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2: The Innovation-Policy Gap

This week's readings were focused on digital privacy.  It is clear from from both Davis (2014) and Leatham & Robertson (2017 ) that there exists some major discrepancies between innovation, the use of technology in education, and policy.  In particular, as I was reading the Leatham & Robertson (2017) article, I began to question my own practices and choices of digital tools in the classroom... do they protect student digital privacy or am I unknowingly putting my students at risk here?  I will certainly be examining the digital tools that I choose much more closely to ensure that this is not the case. I found the following quote from Leatham & Robertson (2017) particularly interesting: "Teachers, and in particular, early adopters appear to be caught in the cross-currents of multiple and contradictory technology imperatives" (p. 3).  This quote really caught my eye because it is linked to the leadership theory that I am working on with my group for Assi...

Week 10: More Case Study Presentations

This week, we continued with the case study presentations in class.  My group presented our case study on moving towards online final assessments in high school eLearning courses.  It was an interesting and positive experience; however, there were some negative aspects to how this was set up in the course that I'd like to explore here. First, our group found that it was a challenge to get the rest of the class up to the same level of knowledge as we had about our case study.  It felt like we spent the majority of the breakout time just getting everyone up to speed that it really took away from the rich discussions that began to occur during the last portion of the breakouts.  We provided our case study presentation via blackboard email a few days prior to class; however, no one likely reviewed it before our presentation.  I'm not even sure how this could be improved upon but I found that this was a reoccurring theme. Also, people need wait time to process...

Week 3: Group Work

I used to really hate and dread anything to do with group work.  I've had some pretty horrible experiences in the past, even as recent as during my B.Ed.  For my biology curriculum course, we needed to plan out an entire unit (on plants) and ALL of the work was basically left for me to complete.  It was the most frustrating group work experience that I've had to date - aren't teachers supposed to collaborate and work together?  If teachers themselves can't do this, how do we expect it of our students? BUT... over the past year and a half, as I've been working on completing my M.Ed. at UOIT, my opinion of group work has done a complete 180.  My mindset has changed for a few reasons; I have gained a better understanding of social constructivist learning theories and I have experienced what and how collaborative learning should be implemented in education.  This past week, I have focused on working on assignment 2 with my group.  We have been develop...