Skip to main content

Week 7: Is an M.Ed. project right for me?

I really appreciated the guest speaker, Lisa Tsumura, that Lorayne had arranged to have in class this week.  Her talk echoed every thought that I have had about whether I want to pursue a project in my Masters program or if I only want to do the course only option.  I've already done the thesis route as I have my Ph.D. in Biochemistry so I really don't want to go through that again (it was a fantastic experience but I know the amount of time and effort that needs to go into it).  I am quite intrigued about the project idea though and Lisa (and this course) has given me a lot to think about. 


Exploring Ideas

As I've been changing my approach to my teaching practices this year, I'm beginning to identify various issues within my subject area.  Chemistry, or any science for that matter, is traditionally taught in a very teacher-directed manner, likely because there is a lot of content to learn in such a short period of time.  As I've been moving away from this model to one that is more student-centred, I am meeting a lot of resistance from both students and parents.  I've even come up against comments such as "I can't learn this way" or "can't you just teach us the traditional way" to "you're not teaching or doing your job".  Just from the conversations that I've had this year, with colleagues as well as with others taking this course, I've seen that other subject areas can easily integrate student-centred approaches so why is it that science can't be taught in a similar manner?  Why is there so much resistance in science against student-centred learning approaches?  Are these perspectives and views actually present?  And if so, how can I, and other science educators, go about changing this?  I have so many questions swimming around in my head and I'm wondering if this is the beginning of a project idea...


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 2: The Innovation-Policy Gap

This week's readings were focused on digital privacy.  It is clear from from both Davis (2014) and Leatham & Robertson (2017 ) that there exists some major discrepancies between innovation, the use of technology in education, and policy.  In particular, as I was reading the Leatham & Robertson (2017) article, I began to question my own practices and choices of digital tools in the classroom... do they protect student digital privacy or am I unknowingly putting my students at risk here?  I will certainly be examining the digital tools that I choose much more closely to ensure that this is not the case. I found the following quote from Leatham & Robertson (2017) particularly interesting: "Teachers, and in particular, early adopters appear to be caught in the cross-currents of multiple and contradictory technology imperatives" (p. 3).  This quote really caught my eye because it is linked to the leadership theory that I am working on with my group for Assi...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 12: Blue Sky Thinking

I have seen a general theme running through both this course and my practice in my leadership role. Technology leadership, or really any leadership, always comes back to RELATIONSHIPS. Fostering good relationships with staff and students creates a positive environment which is key to gaining trust and buy-in. This, in turn, allows for risk-taking and innovation. As I look back on the course, relationships were seen interwoven throughout the course content. For example, relationships were central to many of the leadership theories that I examined early on in the course. As a leader, using and modelling the use of technology can influence attitudes, as seen in social learning behaviour, which can then influence behaviours. This is linked to the theory of reasoned action, which describes how attitudes as well as norms can influence behaviour. Both attitudes and beliefs about the usefulness of introducing and adopting a new technology will influence the adoption. Communities o...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 11: Looking Back

This week in class, we took a look back at the learning goals that was provided at the beginning of the course.  I think that I have met most, if not all, of these goals but I think that it is an important exercise for me to critically analyze and measure how I am doing for each one individually: Goal 1: Theory to practice. Apply new understandings of tech leadership theory to practice and in the course. This is perhaps one of the goals that I dedicated the most time and effort towards.  The course was really designed around not only learning about tech leadership theories, but also applying these theories in practice.  In the course, this was evident during the theory presentation assignment, the case study assignment, and the blue sky metaphor assignment (at least that's the plan since it's not until next week!).  It's pretty interesting how much the theory from this course has also crossed over to my professional practice as well.  I find that I'm even q...
Post a Comment
Read more